Even without any such comparison, the people of Bangladesh know first-hand the horrific nature and extent of that genocide. Every year we celebrate our Independence Day and Victory Day. Despite being quite divided and dysfunctional politically, we regularly remember the independence struggle and the 9-month long genocide as a nation. There are many who constantly speak and write about the horrors of 1971 and our awareness (chetona) of it. Over three decades have passed since the genocide and gaining of independence but there has been no accountability for the war crimes, and emotional healing for integration of the nation continues to elude us.

I remember the horror of 1971 from my limited personal experience as a 12 year old boy. Yet, more than three decades after that genocide the boisterous ritual of remembering it, in my opinion, has not made any positive impact on our subsequent history, offering little else but pompous vacuity. But more importantly, I find the silence and negligence of many others, especially the so-called Islamist-oriented segment of Bangladeshis, agonising and disturbing.

I have been out of the country as an expatriate since 1981. Throughout this period I have come across people of various backgrounds, Muslims and non-Muslims, whose ignorance about the genocide has astounded and baffled me. There are many Pakistanis whose indifference, or even prejudice, I could understand and attribute to the malicious manipulation and distortion of facts and history by the ruling elite of Pakistan (then West Pakistan). Yet the problem seems to be endemic.

A crime committed by anyone against anyone else is a crime. A genocide committed by anyone against anyone else is genocide. To me, as a human being who is a Muslim, it can't be any other way. I had a rude awakening 5-6 years ago when I was invited by one of the leading Islamic monthly magazine in the United States to contribute an essay with the theme "Muslim Unity" to one of its upcoming issues.

I reminded the editor about my often unorthodox or non-conformist views or approach, but I was still asked to send in the essay. The editor, most probably, regretted it upon receipt of my essay. While the editor commended my write-up I was requested to remove a portion from there in order to conform to their length requirement. I was told that if I just removed the part related to Bangladesh and the genocide in 1971, it would be excellent and conform to their length requirement. I firmly refused. I was deeply disappointed and I sat on the article for more than a year before publishing it elsewhere.

Over the last few years since I have actively participated in numerous cyber-exchanges that revolved around topics related to our history, independence struggle, and the genocide. My experience has been that generally we are quite emotional and partisan, unable to engage in substantive discourse that promotes accountability and facilitates healing. Last year, when I shared with the Bangladeshi cyber community some western work on genocide in general and 1971 in particular, one overly zealous writer showered 'obhishaap' [curse] on me, because one non-academic work of one of the western authors about the genocide in 1971 had some significant omissions or lapses.

Before being saddled with such 'obhishaap', however, I had already contacted the western author about these lapses and he readily explained that he was not an expert on the 1971 genocide, and that particular piece was merely an introduction for the general cyber community that was interested in various genocides. He also welcomed any pertinent corrections so that he could consider revising his piece. Evidently, while some people interested in presenting the genocide would appreciate better information, some of us seem more enamored with partisan feelings and flinging curses, instead of providing accurate information to those people.

As I began to take a closer look at the available works on the 1971 genocide, I was truly disappointed and disturbed by the misinformation, as well as lack of information, about it. Relevant to note, the internet in recent times has become an essential media of information, but what is available online about the genocide is indeed pitiful. Deeply saddened I decided to start a website about the 1971 genocide in February 2003. As I communicated with some genocide experts my suspicion about misinformation as well as lack of information was corroborated before long.

Here is a summary picture. There are about 20+ different universities in the USA that offer either a research centre and/or some degree programme on genocide studies. These universities include major, well-known ones such as Yale University and University of Minnesota, and others such as Clark University and Drew University. The most commonly and extensively covered genocide is the Jewish holocaust in Nazi Germany. However, among the other common ones are those that occurred in Armenia, Cambodia, Russia, Rwanda, and Bosnia. While there are several universities that cover one or more such genocides, there is not a single university that has a research programme on the 1971 genocide in Bangladesh. There are also focused courses covering one or more such genocides, but not a single course is focused on this 1971 genocide.

Almost all the major western countries, including United Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark, Australia, have one or more such genocide studies or degree programmes. As far as covering the 1971 genocide is concerned, it is no different with these countries either.


There are a good number of international organisations that focus on genocides. Some of these are generally focused on creating awareness about past genocides, preventing future ones and/or addressing any ongoing ones. Some of the notable ones are: End Genocide, an initiative of World Federalist Association with headquarters in the US; FEWER, USA; Gendercide Watch, Canada; Genocide Prevention Initiative, run by Aegis Trust in United Kingdom; Genocide Research Project, University of Memphis and Pennsylvania State University, USA; Genocide Watch, Netherlands; Prevent Genocide International, a global network; Centre for the Prevention of Genocide; Web Genocide Documentation Centre, University of the West of England.


Except Gendercide Watch, none of the other ones had any information or link about the 1971 genocide. Gendercide Watch included a web link to the Liberation War Museum in Bangladesh. Others did not have any such links listed. Some of these are now being updated with the new site that I have just begun.

There are four academic journals that are focused on genocide studies. They have been there for years. Unfortunately, my search did not turn up any refereed paper on genocide in Bangladesh in 1971.

This should make us wonder how much do we, the Bangladeshis, really care in a substantive manner about what happened in 1971, and what have we constructively and proactively done in creating awareness about that terrible tragedy. This question is especially pertinent for those who also want to establish some kind of accountability for the genocide and the crimes against humanity. While web pages dedicated by Bangladeshis to the 1971 genocide and the independence struggle may abound, most of these are merely emotional statements and/or personal memoirs. These are valuable, indeed, but collectively they do not contribute adequately toward increasing global awareness about the genocide.

Of course, the bulk of the work has to be institutional and Bangladesh Liberation War Museum has done the most valuable and extensive work. However, we are in the cyber age, and presence of information online is critical for wide and easy dissemination. While really substantive work must remain to be carried out by pertinent endowed institutions and organisations, individuals can also make a meaningful difference in this regard.

It was with this goal in mind that a new website dedicated to the 1971 genocide was conceived. It is still in progress. But the pertinent materials that have already been assembled at the site are substantive, and readers should find these valuable.

For example, how many of us know that in 1971 the International Commission of Jurists undertook an investigative study of the events? Though the work remained incomplete due to lack of cooperation from the Pakistani rulers, the Commission did publish its study in 1972, which still remains one of the most referred to sources by all those who work on the 1971 genocide. How many Bangladeshis have read this document? It is a must reading for all those who want to know and create awareness about the events in 1971. The new site has that entire document online, within the reach of all those with internet access.

One of the goals behind creating this site is to help improve awareness among the global Muslim community, as they seem to have a hypocritical stance regarding the genocide. While they know and care about the genocide in Bosnia and Chechnya, most of them neither know about the 1971 genocide, nor do they seem to care about it. Could it be that when Muslims perpetrate genocide, we need to treat it differently than when Muslims are victims of the same?

One of the reasons genocides have occurred in distant and not-so-distant history is because human beings have often lost their own humanity and their faith in humanity; consequently, treating other fellow human beings, Muslims or non-Muslims, communists or non-communists, Jews or non-Jews, Armenians or non-Armenians, in inhuman manner seemed acceptable. If our faith, philosophy, ideology, creed, conviction do not guide and inspire us to rise above our parochial views and attitudes, to see these matters at the human level, we may not have seen the last of genocides.

Hence, as a Bangladeshi, I can't care only about the genocide committed against the Bengalis. As a Muslim, I can't care only about the genocide committed against the Muslims. As an Asian, I can't care only about the genocides committed against the Asians. As human beings, we need to care about any and all genocides committed against any group of humans. Wherever possible, we must expose the perpetrators and hold them accountable, and continue to work toward preventing any future genocide anywhere on earth.

You are invited to visit this website about the 1971 Genocide at http://www.globalwebpost.com/genocide1971 and help in further developing it as a major resource site for information about the 1971 genocide. Let us help the world be informed about the genocide in 1971, just as it is about all other genocides. At the institutional level, Bangladesh and Bangladeshis should work toward establishing genocide studies programmes, with special focus on 1971, and also be connected with all those around the world who are working on the noble goal to prevent future genocides.

Mohammad Omar Farooq is a faculty at Upper Iowa University, USA.


 

Article Tools
Show Printable Version
Email this Page

Attached Images

To view this attachment your post count must be min. 10

Mine shows that Im obviously divided between the just dicking around Lightroom © on PBase and the serious "Photography By" on Zenfolio and that I need to spend more time on the Zen than the crap I usually put on PBase...Hows that for confession?

ok, ok apologize this not fake but quality not that, what must be...... has listened for a moment.... shall wait release

I have made one more test and now I think I know what is the funcionality of Reset Bus method, but I want a confirmation about why this happens:If I create the port, then I open it with HyperTerminal, and then I close my program, the port will remain created.Then if I open my program again, I have to close the HyperTerminal and click on Reset Bus and just then I can create the port again.I will try now to check if the port is created before click the create button. Or try to check if there are ports created at the begining of the program....

i got a friend who can play throgh fire and the flames on expert not looking at the tv and get 98 lol i should tell him about this compitition

Ladies And Gentlemen, This is MR.R&B from Urumchi,China.As my nickname suggests,I have a strong passion for R&B.But it doesnt follow that I dislike other styles.If it is nice,I like all kinds of music,including Classical music with modern elements. Now what I want to say is that I am much interested about your knowledge of Uyghur music from Veten Shinjang,China.What do you think of them ?What suggestions would you give to our music in Veten?I would be greatly appreciate it if you would participate in this discussion.I would collect all of your comments,advice,suggestions and post them in Uyghur forum in China in order to make more people know what our Uyghur brothers and sisters think of our music in here Veten. So Please...But first,let me say something about Uyghur music in KZ. Personally speaking,there do exist some talented and highly professional Uyghur musicians in KZ.There is no doubt that Dervishi is the best among them.Of course,Zulpikar,Dilnaz and Art-Rap,Gruppa Diyar is my favorite ,too.However I think ,probably we need some kind of musical groups with more modern style.For example,if there is an Uyghur R&B Group in KZ, just like Kazakh Group Orda,how nice it would be? Young Uyghur generation are thirsty for modern Uyghur songs,Hip-Hop,Rock,Pop and the rest.Do you agree.So this is something that Uyghur musicians should consider.

My mother used to know a gay, he was a pleasant guy.
I have nothing against their orientation, I myself played the role of lesbian in the past to get rid of guys
I just against imposing gay ideas on other people, especially vulnerable
kids.

Hello againMy textbook just pops these symbols out at me without explanation. Maybe it just expects I know this stuff In the equation Vs = Delta d / Delta tI know that d is distance and t is time, so why include the Delta. What is the meaning of Delta itself and in this particular set of instances.ThanksS

I know, but the question was pretty inane, compared to what he had to say I think he generally was answering the questions, except in a roundabout theological way which is a terribly Jewish rabbinic thing to do, I gather. It still bugs me a little that Jeremy Vine interupted him and cut him off, but let Sister Wendy rabbit on tying herself in knots. As I recall, he had the most to say about what God is like. Everyone else pretty much talked about our faith, or our religion, or our spirituality, and not very much about God. Maybe the next show the BBC does should be What Does God Think Of The World?...So did anyone else except Graeme, Sam, and I see the show?Barthez

I am thinging that pathologists around the world knows many important thinks of pathologe and forensic medicine. But it dont mean, that patologists know all problems and pazzls of endless world medicine. We are on the edge Gigantic science sizes which we dont imagine. Those, who going behind of us will without
put same questions for yourself. And will have not answers......

This virus inconvenienced me yesterday, as so many people were last minute worried that it overloaded our local service provider and I couldnt get online... beyond that, Im not overly concerned - although I dont get overly concerned about anything until its too late.

Just thought Id add that every time I have seen the delta symbol, in math or physics, it generally has stood for "change in".For example, back in the day when we were learning to graph linear equations, my teacher gave us the equation for slope in the form of "delta y over delta x", meaning the difference in two y values divided by the difference in two x values.To me, trying to use delta to stand for something besides this would be as confusing as trying to use pi to stand for something other than the ratio of circumference divided by diameter.

You guys are twisting my words around. Nobody made any extraordinary claims. My notes are an educational material. Educational material costs money. These are not a mere scribbling on the side of Kaplan texts or what you and I write in our notebooks. These are actual review material for Step I; I just called them notes similar to Toronto Notes, if you know what I mean. Sample URL link is provided, to those who are interested.Thank You.

You guys are twisting my words around.You might have noticed that I attempted to be careful and was only cutting and pasting your words. Nothing else. So the term “twisting” is not applicable. My notes are an educational material. Educational material costs money.I think we’ve already discussed vs. help These are not a mere scribbling on the side of Kaplan texts or what you and I write in our notebooks.If you are being trained appropriately, you should know that a clinician should never make assumptions. How do you know how I am compiling my notes? These are actual review material for Step I; I just called them notes similar to Toronto Notes, if you know what I mean.I used Toronto Notes when I was a student. The problem is that most of the people in this forum are in US and are planning to practice in US. They have either very little or nothing to do with Canada. Therefore, it doesn’t seem that you’re using examples appropriately. In my subjective opinion it doesn’t add much to your credibility. Thank You.If you thank me for working so hard to bring your information in the center of people’s attention, you are very welcome :

Thanx Lew,
I agree, what a bummer. The small chunk I heard on "Shining Stars" had Phillip written all over it. Well, maybe in a couple of years when they release the Rough cut versions from those sessions, huh?
Thanx,
Dawg